Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dana Baidaulet vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baidaulet vs Peeters analysis and find out who is favored!
Dana Baidaulet vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Baidaulet 0 - 0 Peeters
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baidaulet has won 37.61% of points on their second serve, while Peeters has won 40.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baidaulet, in recent form, has won 55.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peeters has won 57.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.62% and 42.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baidaulet has saved 48.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peeters has saved 56.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baidaulet has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 15/ 18), with Peeters winning 50.98% (W/L 26/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baidaulet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 18/ 18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 36/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Baidaulet has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.39% of matches (W/L 15/ 16), where as Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 22/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baidaulet has played against opponents with an average rank of 105.61 while Peeters has played against players with an average rank of 128.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baidaulet has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peeters has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baidaulet has converted 49.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peeters has converted 48.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
42% (24-33)
Career Total W/L
56% (75-58)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dana Baidaulet | Anouck Vrancken Peeters |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (27/28) | 53% (27/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (238/259) | 54% (241/205) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 138 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:41:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 115.16 | 138.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (554/889) | 60% (857/1417) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (301/554) | 62% (533/857) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (126/335) | 41% (227/560) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (56/114) | 49% (93/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (425/901) | 49% (641/1318) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (13/11) | 53% (9/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 9% (11/1) |
Dana Baidaulet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Kaili Demi Teso
Player
Dana Baidaulet
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(2) 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Yushchenko
Player
Dana Baidaulet
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Anastasiia Kochelaevskaia
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 0-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Dana Baidaulet
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
72 of
95)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
52%
(
46 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Svetlana Shusteva
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
2-6 6-1 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
59 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Zi Ying Ruan
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Tilda Hessleryd
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Cecilie Wiche
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
16
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Baidaulet Vs Peeters Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Baidaulet are available here and Peeters photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
